Turkey climbs up 6 spots in competitiveness (01.11.2007)

Turkey jumped up six spots to 53rd place among 131 countries in the overall ranking of The Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008, released by the World Economic Forum yesterday.

Last year Turkey was only ahead of Romania and Bulgaria among EU and EU-candidate countries. This year Turkey passed Croatia (57th), Greece (65th), Romania (74th) and Bulgaria (79th). Turkey was 59th among 125 countries last year. The report said Turkey climbing up 21 places in two years, as it had also climbed 12 places last year over the preceding year, can be credited to reforms made after the 2001 economic crisis.

Meanwhile, in the same ranking the US regained its status as the world's most competitive economy thanks to strong innovation and excellent universities.

The US rebounded from sixth place to knock Switzerland from the top spot in the "global competitiveness index." The Swiss were second this year, followed by Denmark, Sweden, Germany and Finland. The study by the Geneva-based forum said the United States was boosted by its close cooperation between universities and business on research and development and strict intellectual property protection, as well as efficient use of employees and investments.

But increasing public indebtedness in the United States threatens to hamper the country's growth, it said. "This danger has most recently been demonstrated by the fallout and contagion caused by the country's sub-prime mortgage crisis and the ensuing global credit crunch," said Xavier Sala-i-Martin, a professor of economics at Columbia University and one of the authors of the report.

Sala-i-Martin said the weaknesses “present a risk to the country’s overall competitiveness potential and to the global economy as a whole.”

Switzerland was credited with an excellent capacity for innovation, a sophisticated business culture, outstanding scientific research institutions and strong intellectual property protection. Denmark and Sweden were ranked third and fourth respectively, followed by Germany and Finland. The Nordic countries -- traditionally strong in the report -- were praised for their budget surpluses and very low levels of public indebtedness. Germany’s good performance is largely due to its high-quality infrastructure and the efficiency of its goods and financial markets, according to the report. The same positive elements also boosted Britain, which came in ninth. More than 11,000 business leaders in 131 countries took part in the report, which ranked Singapore seventh, followed by Japan, Britain and the Netherlands.

China and India, two emerging economies, were in the middle of the 131-nation list. China has improved to 34th from 54th last year. Its competitiveness was based mainly on its large market and a stable economy with low inflation and high savings. India’s 48th-place ranking was mainly attributed to the high availability of scientists and engineers and good quality of scientific research institutions in an economy with a large market size.

At the bottom of the list were countries primarily in sub-Saharan Africa, such as Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Burundi and Chad.

The aim of the report is to examine the factors that can affect a country’s business environment and development. Included are judicial independence, government favoritism and corruption.

As part of the weak points in the United States, the report listed insufficient judicial independence and high security costs for businesses. It said the business community was particularly concerned about government favoritism in dealings with companies. But the greatest flaw was economic instability, according to the report. “The United States has built up large macroeconomic imbalances over recent years, with repeated fiscal deficits leading to rising levels of public indebtedness,” it said. High budget and trade deficits were also cited among the key factors which made the US fall to sixth in last year’s poll. The US was top-ranked in 2005.